January Through December 2024
Throughout the year, Supervisors should be tracking the following information to provide proof for Annual Reviews:
**Ensure to document inconsistencies, problems, and areas needing improvement.
May 2024 – Performance Review Rollout
Provide Instructions and training to supervisors, connect supervisors with the Program Manager (Savannah Shulman), and provide Dashboard access.
June 2024 – Mid Cycle Touch Base with Employees. Informal Review Discussion
We recommend Supervisors perform touch base reviews with each employee to discuss performance and the upcoming performance review process at the end of the year.
January 2025 – Performance Appraisal Process begins.
Supervisors should conduct and complete the following steps within 2 weeks for each employee:
Performance appraisals are prepared by each employee's immediate supervisor as follows:
Supervisors shall keep ongoing notes to maintain administrative records regarding job performance, to document informal personnel actions, and to support subsequent formal performance appraisal.
When Supervisors receive requests for completion of performance appraisals from HR, the supervisor will open the document and fill in the Employee’s Name, Job Title and Department Manager, Employee's Date of Hire, and Review Period.
Before beginning to assess the Employee's performance, Supervisors must review the ratings system, the employee’s completed self-evaluation form, and prepare to rate every category in the most fair and objective manner.
The core competencies are evaluated for all employees and require the Supervisor to rate the employee’s skills in the following fundamental areas:
**Supervisors are required to provide comments along with specific examples to support the rating of each category
Calculate each section and then total appraisal points:
Performance Indicators: Supervisors and Employees should become familiar with the definitions of each Performance Indicator before attempting to navigate through the Performance Evaluation Process
means the Employee consistently performs at a level beyond the expectations for the important aspects of his/her position. Little to no instruction is needed to perform assigned tasks. Each rating of "Exceeds Expectations" equals 4 points.
means the Employee consistently performs his/her job well and meets expectations for the important aspects of his/her position. Meets expectations by performing “core” duties. Each rating of "Meets Expectations" equals 3 points.
means that the Employee falls significantly below requirements and lacks consistency in key areas. Quality and/or quantity of work need improvement. More attention to detail is needed, as well as fewer errors. Each rating of "Below Expectations" equals 2 point.
This rating is for unacceptable performance that consistently fails to meet the basic requirements and the supervisor has repeatedly coached the Employee with written documentation. Errors are considerable and the quality/quantity of the work is considered poor. Each rating of "Below Expectations" equals 1 point.
** AN EMPLOYEE SHOULD NEVER BE SURPRISED BY AN UNSATISFACORY RATING. Ratings that score below "Effective" should have been preceded by coaching, write-ups, and counseling throughout the year. If prior documented administration action was not completed throughout the review period, the supervisor FAILED to properly act and the punishment of the employee would be unfair.
Any employee receiving an overall rating of “Developing or Unsatisfactory Performance” that does not meet expectations
©WorkforceConsultantsLLC. All rights reserved.
We need your consent to load the translations
We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.